How do you feel about the ending of Plato’s Theaetetus?
- It was frustrating that they couldn’t come to a conclusion.
- I was relieved that they didn’t define knowledge because it would have been too narrow.
- It makes me think that maybe we can’t define knowledge.
- I didn’t really mind the ending because the journey was more important than the destination.
What’s your favorite aspect of the Socratic method as it is presented in Theaetetus?
- It’s so satisfying to watch Socrates dismantle these flawed definitions.
- I love the way it helps you see things in a completely new light.
- It’s just so much fun to listen to these guys think through these ideas.
- It’s a perfect example of how to have a philosophical conversation.
What makes you nervous about defining knowledge?
- I’m afraid I’ll get it wrong.
- I’m worried that I’ll miss something important.
- I’m concerned about what it means for my own beliefs.
- I’m not sure I want to know the truth.
What makes you most frustrated about the current state of the discourse about knowledge?
- Everyone is so quick to claim they have the answer.
- There’s so much confusion and disagreement.
- People don’t seem to be taking the search for knowledge seriously.
- It seems like we’re just going in circles.
What are you most excited about when it comes to exploring the nature of knowledge?
- The possibility of discovering something new.
- The potential to understand the world better.
- The chance to challenge my own assumptions.
- The opportunity to learn from others.
What do you dream about when it comes to knowledge?
- Finding a definitive answer to the question of what knowledge is.
- Understanding the world in a way that no one else does.
- Creating a system of knowledge that is perfect and complete.
- Sharing my knowledge with others and making a difference.
What happened in the past when you tried to define something?
- I ended up getting lost in a maze of words.
- I realized that I didn’t really know what I was talking about.
- I got into an argument with someone who had a different definition.
- I felt like I was just spinning my wheels.
What comes to mind when you think about the idea of “true opinion”
- A belief that is accurate but not necessarily justified.
- A gut feeling that turns out to be right.
- A statement that is based on a solid foundation of evidence.
- A conviction that is held with a high degree of certainty.
What’s your favorite memory of a time you felt you truly learned something?
- The moment I finally understood a concept that had been confusing me for a long time.
- Discovering a new perspective on a subject that I thought I knew well.
- Realizing that I was wrong about something I had always believed.
- Sharing my newfound knowledge with someone else and seeing them learn.
When you were a kid, how did you think about the world?
- Everything was a mystery, and I was eager to learn.
- I believed that anything was possible.
- I was curious about how things worked.
- I was fascinated by the stories I heard.
You have a choice of learning about perception or learning about true opinion. Which do you choose?
- Perception, because I want to understand how our senses shape our reality.
- True opinion, because I want to know what it means to have a justified belief.
- Both, because they are both important parts of understanding knowledge.
- Neither, because I’m more interested in exploring the nature of knowledge itself.
A specific situation arises in which you need to convince someone of something. How do you react?
- I try to present my arguments logically and persuasively.
- I appeal to the person’s emotions.
- I try to find common ground with the person.
- I question the person’s assumptions.
What keeps you up at night about the nature of knowledge?
- The possibility that we will never truly understand the world.
- The idea that we might be living in a world of illusion.
- The fear that we might be making decisions based on false information.
- The realization that we are constantly learning and evolving.
Which of these would you enjoy the most: attending a lecture on perception, a debate on true opinion, or a discussion on the Socratic method?
- A lecture on perception, because I want to understand how our senses work.
- A debate on true opinion, because I want to hear different perspectives on this complex issue.
- A discussion on the Socratic method, because I want to learn how to have better philosophical conversations.
- None of the above, because I’m more interested in exploring the nature of knowledge itself.
When you think about Theaetetus, what are you most concerned about?
- His willingness to accept Socrates’ arguments without question.
- His lack of confidence in his own ideas.
- His inability to define knowledge.
- His vulnerability to being misled by Socrates.
What aspect of Theaetetus makes you the most happy?
- His eagerness to learn.
- His willingness to challenge his own assumptions.
- His commitment to finding the truth.
- His ability to engage in deep philosophical conversation.
What is most likely to make you feel down about exploring the nature of knowledge?
- The realization that we may never know the truth.
- The difficulty of defining abstract concepts.
- The possibility of being wrong about something.
- The limitations of human understanding.
In a perfect world, what would the dialogue between Socrates, Theodorus, and Theaetetus be like?
- It would be a more collaborative and less adversarial.
- It would lead to a definitive definition of knowledge.
- It would be more focused on practical applications of knowledge.
- It would be more inclusive of different perspectives.
If you could waive a magic wand, what would the perfect outcome of this dialogue be?
- The discovery of a universal definition of knowledge.
- A deeper understanding of the nature of reality.
- A more enlightened and just society.
- A world where everyone has access to knowledge.
How often do you find yourself questioning your own beliefs?
- All the time, I’m constantly trying to challenge my own assumptions.
- Every now and then, when I encounter a new perspective or challenge to my beliefs.
- Rarely, I tend to be pretty confident in my beliefs.
- Never, I believe what I believe and that’s the end of it.
You are at a party and someone starts talking about the nature of knowledge. What do you do?
- I engage in a lively philosophical conversation.
- I politely excuse myself and find someone else to talk to.
- I try to change the subject.
- I listen intently and try to learn as much as I can.
How comfortable are you with the idea that we may never be able to fully define knowledge?
- I’m completely comfortable with it.
- I’m okay with it, but I hope we can still make progress.
- I’m not comfortable with it, but I accept it.
- I’m not comfortable with it at all.
You have 24 hours to do whatever you want related to the nature of knowledge. What do you do?
- I spend the entire day reading philosophical texts.
- I try to have deep philosophical conversations with as many people as possible.
- I experiment with different ways of thinking about knowledge.
- I meditate and try to access a higher level of consciousness.
Which of these is most likely to be a struggle for you: questioning your own beliefs, understanding different perspectives on knowledge, or accepting that we may never fully understand knowledge?
- Questioning my own beliefs, I’m afraid I might be wrong.
- Understanding different perspectives on knowledge, I tend to be skeptical of viewpoints that differ from my own.
- Accepting that we may never fully understand knowledge, I want to find a definitive answer.
- None of the above, I’m comfortable with the challenges of exploring knowledge.
Which member of the group are you: Socrates, Theodorus, or Theaetetus?
- Socrates, I love to question assumptions and challenge people’s beliefs.
- Theodorus, I’m a skilled thinker and I value accuracy and precision.
- Theaetetus, I’m eager to learn and I’m open to new ideas.
- None of the above, I’m my own person and I have my own unique perspective on knowledge.
New information related to the nature of knowledge comes up. What is your first response?
- I try to understand the new information in the context of what I already know.
- I’m skeptical and I want to see evidence to support the new information.
- I’m excited to learn something new.
- I’m afraid that the new information might be wrong.
Someone asks “What do you think about the nature of knowledge?” What’s the actual answer, not just “I’m not sure?”
- I think it’s a complex and challenging question.
- I believe that knowledge is something that we can never fully understand.
- I think that knowledge is a journey, not a destination.
- I think that knowledge is power.
What’s your go-to podcast, book, or resource for learning about the nature of knowledge?
- The History of Philosophy Podcast
- The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
- The Republic by Plato
- The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
What’s your favorite memory related to the nature of knowledge?
- The moment I realized how much I didn’t know.
- The first time I had a deep philosophical conversation with someone.
- The feeling of discovering something new and exciting.
- The experience of having my mind blown by a new idea.
What causes, topics, or interests are you most passionate about?
- Understanding the nature of reality.
- Exploring the history of philosophy.
- Challenging traditional ways of thinking.
- Promoting critical thinking and intellectual curiosity.
What is your absolute favorite way to spend time learning about philosophy?
- Reading philosophical texts.
- Having philosophical conversations with friends.
- Attending lectures and talks.
- Taking online courses.
How would your friends and family describe your relationship to the pursuit of knowledge?
- They would say that I’m a lifelong learner who is always curious about the world.
- They would say that I’m a bit of a philosopher at heart.
- They would say that I’m always asking questions and trying to understand things.
- They would say that I’m a bit of a know-it-all.
Tell us a little about your view on the role of doubt in the pursuit of knowledge.
- I believe that doubt is essential for learning.
- I think that doubt is a sign of intellectual humility.
- I’m comfortable with doubt and I don’t mind not knowing things.
- I try to avoid doubt because I don’t want to be unsure of myself.
If you could choose any state of being related to knowledge, which one would you choose and why?
- To be perfectly knowledgeable, because I would know everything there is to know.
- To be a master of critical thinking, because I would be able to analyze information and form my own conclusions.
- To be a lifelong learner, because I would always be open to new knowledge and experiences.
- To be a wise and compassionate person, because I would be able to use my knowledge to make a positive impact on the world.
What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you hear someone say “Knowledge is power?”
- I think about the potential for knowledge to be used for good or evil.
- I think about the responsibility that comes with knowledge.
- I think about the importance of education and access to information.
- I think about the dangers of misinformation and propaganda.
What affects you the most when it comes to your pursuit of knowledge?
- The desire to understand the world.
- The fear of being wrong.
- The excitement of learning something new.
- The challenge of facing complex ideas.
What’s your idea of the perfect learning environment?
- A place where people can freely exchange ideas and challenge each other’s assumptions.
- A place where everyone is encouraged to think for themselves.
- A place where knowledge is accessible to everyone.
- A place where learning is fun and engaging.
What is your strongest attribute when it comes to learning about philosophy?
- My intellectual curiosity.
- My ability to think critically.
- My willingness to challenge my own assumptions.
- My commitment to lifelong learning.
How prepared are you for encountering a difficult philosophical argument?
- I’m always ready for a challenge.
- I’m pretty well-prepared, but I could always use more practice.
- I’m not sure how I’d handle it, but I’d try my best.
- I’m not really prepared for that.
What happens if you encounter a philosophical idea that contradicts your own beliefs?
- I try to understand the other perspective and see if there’s any merit to it.
- I stick to my own beliefs and ignore the opposing viewpoint.
- I try to find ways to reconcile the two viewpoints.
- I get defensive and try to prove the other person wrong.
What do you think you need to deepen your understanding of the nature of knowledge?
- More time to study.
- More opportunities to engage in philosophical discussion.
- More experiences with different cultures and ways of thinking.
- More guidance from experts in the field.
How often do you engage in critical thinking and analysis of information?
- All the time, I’m always trying to evaluate information and make my own judgments.
- Every now and then, I try to be more critical of what I’m reading and hearing.
- Rarely, I tend to accept information at face value.
- Never, I don’t think it’s necessary to be critical of what I’m learning.
How confident are you in your ability to identify and challenge false beliefs?
- I’m very confident in my ability to identify false beliefs.
- I’m confident, but I know I still have room to grow.
- I’m not sure how confident I am, but I’m working on it.
- I’m not very confident in my ability to identify false beliefs.
How do you handle encountering someone who holds different beliefs than you do?
- I try to engage in a respectful and productive dialogue.
- I avoid the topic altogether.
- I try to convince them that they are wrong.
- I get angry and try to shut down the conversation.
Do you have a philosophy of knowledge or is it just something you learn about?
- I have my own philosophy of knowledge.
- I’m still developing my philosophy of knowledge.
- I’m not sure I have a philosophy of knowledge, but I’m open to the idea.
- I don’t think it’s necessary to have a philosophy of knowledge.
How well do you stick to your convictions when faced with conflicting information?
- I’m very good at sticking to my convictions.
- I’m able to adjust my beliefs based on new information.
- I’m not sure how well I stick to my convictions.
- I’m easily swayed by conflicting information.
Which of the following is most accurate when it comes to your perception of the world?
- I see the world as a complex and ever-changing place.
- I see the world as a simple and predictable place.
- I see the world as a place of endless possibilities.
- I see the world as a place of danger and uncertainty.
To what degree do you experience doubt and uncertainty when it comes to your knowledge?
- I experience a lot of doubt and uncertainty.
- I experience some doubt and uncertainty, but I’m learning to manage it.
- I don’t experience much doubt or uncertainty.
- I don’t believe in doubt or uncertainty.
Which of these best describes your current state of mind when it comes to your quest for knowledge?
- I’m eager to learn and explore new ideas.
- I’m feeling a bit lost and unsure of myself.
- I’m confident and certain of my beliefs.
- I’m tired of learning and I’m ready to settle down.
What is your current biggest challenge in your pursuit of knowledge?
- Finding the time to read and study.
- Overcoming my own biases and prejudices.
- Dealing with the complexity of the world.
- Accepting that I may never fully understand the nature of knowledge.
What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you encounter a problem or question that you don’t have the answer to?
- I try to find the answer by researching or asking for help.
- I get frustrated and try to avoid the problem.
- I accept that I don’t know the answer and move on.
- I make up an answer and hope for the best.
How do you handle encountering a situation that requires you to make a decision based on incomplete information?
- I weigh the pros and cons of each option and make the best decision I can based on the information I have.
- I flip a coin and let fate decide.
- I go with my gut feeling.
- I procrastinate and hope the problem will go away on its own.
How would you describe your relationship to knowledge?
- I see knowledge as a journey of discovery and exploration.
- I see knowledge as a tool for understanding the world.
- I see knowledge as a source of power and influence.
- I see knowledge as a burden, something that I have to constantly learn and remember.
Are you stuck in a particular way of thinking about knowledge, or are you open to new perspectives?
- I’m open to new perspectives and I’m always looking for new ways to learn.
- I tend to stick to my own way of thinking, but I’m willing to consider new ideas.
- I’m pretty set in my ways and I’m not really interested in new perspectives.
- I don’t think it’s important to be open to new perspectives.
What would you say are your top struggles right now in your pursuit of knowledge?
- Finding the time to learn.
- Staying motivated.
- Dealing with information overload.
- Overcoming my own biases.
What is your knowledge goal?
- To acquire as much knowledge as possible.
- To use knowledge to make a positive impact on the world.
- To achieve a deeper understanding of the nature of reality.
- To become a recognized expert in a particular field.
What do you think is missing in your quest to achieve your knowledge goal?
- More time and resources.
- A stronger sense of purpose.
- A more supportive community.
- A better understanding of myself and my own limitations.
What is your current level of expertise in the field of philosophy?
- I’m a beginner.
- I’m an intermediate learner.
- I’m an advanced learner.
- I’m an expert.
A scenario arises in which you must apply your knowledge of philosophy to a real-life situation. How do you respond?
- I draw on my knowledge of philosophical principles to guide my decision-making.
- I rely on my intuition and common sense.
- I ask for advice from others.
- I avoid making a decision altogether.
What physical, emotional, or tactical sensation do you experience most when you are engaged in the pursuit of knowledge?
- A sense of excitement and wonder.
- A sense of peace and tranquility.
- A sense of frustration and confusion.
- A sense of satisfaction and accomplishment.
Which of the following do you notice yourself worrying about on a day-to-day basis?
- Missing out on new knowledge.
- Making mistakes in my pursuit of knowledge.
- Not being taken seriously as a learner.
- Not being able to keep up with the pace of knowledge production.
How confident and certain do you feel in your knowledge?
- I’m very confident and certain in my knowledge.
- I’m confident, but I know there’s always more to learn.
- I’m not sure how confident I am, but I’m working on it.
- I’m not very confident in my knowledge.
How well do you accomplish or execute on a task that requires a deep understanding of philosophical principles?
- I’m able to accomplish the task with ease.
- I’m able to accomplish the task, but it takes some effort.
- I’m not sure how well I’d be able to accomplish the task.
- I’m not able to accomplish the task.
How connected do you feel to the broader world of knowledge?
- I feel very connected to the broader world of knowledge.
- I feel somewhat connected to the broader world of knowledge.
- I feel only slightly connected to the broader world of knowledge.
- I feel disconnected from the broader world of knowledge.
I believe that knowledge is a journey of discovery and that the most important thing is to stay curious and open-minded.
I’m afraid that I might be missing something important in my pursuit of knowledge.
Which of the following is most likely to frustrate you?
- Having to repeat information that you already know.
- Being asked to explain something that you don’t understand.
- Encountering someone who is unwilling to learn.
- Not being able to find the answer to a question.
What is the trickiest part about applying philosophical principles to real-life situations?
- Identifying the relevant philosophical principles.
- Making sure you’re applying the principles correctly.
- Overcoming your own biases.
- Dealing with the complexity of real-life situations.
Do you have a strong philosophical foundation or are you still working on building one?
- I have a strong philosophical foundation.
- I’m still working on building a strong philosophical foundation.
- I’m not sure if I have a strong philosophical foundation.
- I don’t think it’s important to have a strong philosophical foundation.
Do you have a support system in place for your philosophical inquiries, such as a mentor, a book club, or an online community?
- Yes, I have a strong support system.
- Yes, I have a limited support system.
- No, I don’t have a support system.
- I don’t think I need a support system.
How do you determine your student’s learning objectives each semester?
- I meet with my students at the beginning of the semester to discuss their learning goals.
- I base my students’ learning objectives on the curriculum for the course.
- I assess my students’ prior knowledge and design learning objectives accordingly.
- I use a combination of methods to determine my students’ learning objectives.
Are your teaching assistants consistently achieving their assigned tasks?
- Yes, my teaching assistants are consistently achieving their assigned tasks.
- My teaching assistants are mostly achieving their assigned tasks.
- My teaching assistants are not consistently achieving their assigned tasks.
- I don’t have teaching assistants.
How do you manage the grading process for your students’ work?
- I use a rubric to assess students’ work.
- I provide students with feedback on their work.
- I use a variety of methods to assess students’ work.
- I don’t have a consistent grading process.
Learn more
